lesbiassparrow: (Default)
[personal profile] lesbiassparrow
My deep, meaningful review:

1. I had forgotten this was the book where they all got hormones. Way to go, boys and girls! It was sort of fun to watch them.
2. It was not nearly as scary as the book
3. It pains me to say this, because I love the character but Emma Watson may well be the worst actress I have ever seen. Normally people get better over time: she has managed to stay the same through all six movies. When they were little kids it was sort of cute and, besides, none of the trio were very good, but while Radcliffe and Grint aren't exactly great actors as they've gotten a bit better Watson stands out more and more.

Date: 2009-07-22 10:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] queenthesixth.livejournal.com
I didn't notice as much eyebrow acting from Emma Watson this time, for which I was very grateful. What amused me about the HBP is that we get Snape just expositioning towards the end that he is the prince in question and then he walks off. I mean, the film is named after him and that's all we get! No explanation about what that is or why or anything.
And yeah, these films don't exactly show Radcliffe or Grint off as being child prodigy actors.

Date: 2009-07-22 10:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lesbiassparrow.livejournal.com
Well, Watson isn't in this one as much (or so it seemed to me) so she didn't drive me up the wall or anything. But neither of the three really impress at all (though Grint manages comedy, I think.)

Poor Snape. All he does is get to pop up, kill D., and sneer at Harry. A bit of a waste there.


lesbiassparrow: (Default)

August 2011

 1 23456

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 21st, 2017 05:12 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios