lesbiassparrow: (Default)
lesbiassparrow ([personal profile] lesbiassparrow) wrote2006-05-30 01:05 pm
Entry tags:

Doctor Five Abuse

Whenever I watch Peter Davison's Doctor it does seem as if he got the most physical abuse of any of the Doctors: they whack him good.  And they whack him often. I assume this was a way to toughen up his mild image and general aura of niceness, but sometimes it just really freaks me out.

The most disturbing thing was watching The Caves of Androzani where Five is actually stumbling around the place bleeding. I can't tell you very terrifying that was as a child because I don't recall ever seeing blood on Who before - and certainly not on the Doctor, whom I think I probably thought of as pretty much made of wood and steel. Obviously given that this is Who, I'd seen people (plenty of them) hurt and dead, yes, but actual blood, no.  I wonder how they got that past the censors? (I know that ITV used to have a rule for Robin of Sherwood where they could kill as many people as they liked but they couldn't show blood or wounds and I think that was a general rule for deaths on children's TV at the time).

 

[identity profile] lesbiassparrow.livejournal.com 2006-05-31 02:13 am (UTC)(link)
That man would have blown up nuns and poodles if the censors weren't watching.

Hee! I am sure the other reason was because nuns and poodles cost a lot of money (though they still had a budget in those days). Poor Five: I don't think Tegan went in for the mopping of the brow.

I loved Five and Six. I think I may have some sort of personality disorder.

[identity profile] cryptile.livejournal.com 2006-05-31 02:23 am (UTC)(link)
Five and Six needed better stories. Then everyone would have recognized the AWESOMENESS. Though I agree with the point you made earlier; the Fifth's suffering in silence and general passive-agressiveness erupted in the next incarnation.

I'm gonna go look for some Five-Six fangroups now . .

[identity profile] lesbiassparrow.livejournal.com 2006-05-31 03:12 am (UTC)(link)
I do not get the Five and Six dislike. They were awesome! And the writing was at least more comprensible than Seven's. (The stuff they made McCoy go through! And say! Anyone who suffered through acting in Ghostlight with a straight face has my undying admiration.). I joined the Davidson group recently because I needed to share the love.

[identity profile] neadods.livejournal.com 2006-05-31 12:56 pm (UTC)(link)
There's a Davison group? Where?

[identity profile] lesbiassparrow.livejournal.com 2006-05-31 02:29 pm (UTC)(link)
It's here: http://community.livejournal.com/davison_era/profile

[identity profile] lesbiassparrow.livejournal.com 2006-05-31 02:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Only happy to spread Five Doctor love.

Oh, right, that might have come out slightly wrong...

[identity profile] neadods.livejournal.com 2006-05-31 02:54 pm (UTC)(link)
No it didn't!

[identity profile] ghost2.livejournal.com 2006-05-31 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
I think Five is pretty popular with fans, actually. I mostly see support for him. Six, OTOH, gets bashed frequently and openly. I like him fine, though. I had bad memories of him and then fairly recently saw some of his episodes again and enjoyed them.

[identity profile] lesbiassparrow.livejournal.com 2006-06-01 02:53 am (UTC)(link)
I'm glad to hear about Five liking - I somehow ended up seeing a lot of comments about how bland he was and uninteresting, which I don't feel at all. He's not Tom Baker, right, but then only Tom Baker is Tom Baker.

(Again this is only personal experience, but I've not been in Who fandom for very long) Six seems to get a lot of flack for helping kill off the series and mad overacting - something which Seven oddly seems to escape. But Five and Six were my doctors so I have a deep fondness (nay, love) for them. Though I will admit Six wasn't above scenery chewing from time to time.