Last of the Mohicans
Oct. 16th, 2007 10:09 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Well, I think I was right to be suspicious of the 'Last of' element in this film. I enjoyed it thoroughly but it made me melancholy.
It has a terribly sad ending doesn't it? Not just because of Uncas and the sister dying but because it's really about the end of everything for many of these peoples. I don't know the book at all so I have no idea if it's that melancholic or not.
But in any case it started me thinking about how I don't know that much modern fiction is melancholic any more. You get sad, angsty fiction, to be sure, but that pervading sense of sadness where everything gained is paid for with tremendous loss, loss that is so great that you're not sure that the gain is worth it is something that I don't see as a common modern narrative. If you get loss I usually find it's of the apocalyptic sort.
And something absolutely unrelated: I've seen recently a couple of episodes of Stargate: Atlantis and one was the one on the world where they'd found a drug that could kill the wraith but would kill 50% of the population. And I can't help but think that the crew were wankers about the whole thing: I mean, these people had voted on it and had decided rather than the wraith eating them all up they'd rather take a few with them. They knew what they were doing and they would rather have a chance than no chance. And all the Atlantis people were all snooty and judgey about it all and refusing to ever come back because these people didn't listen to them and wait around to be eaten. Are they usually such wankers?
It has a terribly sad ending doesn't it? Not just because of Uncas and the sister dying but because it's really about the end of everything for many of these peoples. I don't know the book at all so I have no idea if it's that melancholic or not.
But in any case it started me thinking about how I don't know that much modern fiction is melancholic any more. You get sad, angsty fiction, to be sure, but that pervading sense of sadness where everything gained is paid for with tremendous loss, loss that is so great that you're not sure that the gain is worth it is something that I don't see as a common modern narrative. If you get loss I usually find it's of the apocalyptic sort.
And something absolutely unrelated: I've seen recently a couple of episodes of Stargate: Atlantis and one was the one on the world where they'd found a drug that could kill the wraith but would kill 50% of the population. And I can't help but think that the crew were wankers about the whole thing: I mean, these people had voted on it and had decided rather than the wraith eating them all up they'd rather take a few with them. They knew what they were doing and they would rather have a chance than no chance. And all the Atlantis people were all snooty and judgey about it all and refusing to ever come back because these people didn't listen to them and wait around to be eaten. Are they usually such wankers?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-17 05:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 04:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-17 06:26 am (UTC)And I have to say, my favorite scene with Alice is when she goes over the edge. It's the most proactive thing she does the whole film! At least Cora is awesome and grabs a pistol after the first time they're ambushed!
Also, Uncas and Natty are HOT. And that cheers me up every time, melancholic end be damned! :D
no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 04:03 am (UTC)I can imagine I wouldn't really enjoy the book though I'm curious to read one of Cooper's books as I haven't read that much American literature from that period.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 03:59 am (UTC)And I do kind of like that time period in American lit, just because there's so much bravado and insecurity turning into jingoism...
no subject
Date: 2007-10-17 08:10 am (UTC)But the novel is pretty gross in the sense of White Man (well, the English) = good; Indian = backwards. Cooper might have written a classic but it is full of misconceptions and prejudices of his time. But I guess he thought highly of the supremacy of the white race :(
no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 04:00 am (UTC)So much literature of that period is infused with manifest destiny and the beliefs of the time that it's hard to get around it.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-17 08:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 03:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-17 11:17 am (UTC)(although as a sidenote, I will never, never forgive Michael Mann for editing the film for the DVD release, so it's not the original theatrical version. While I still have my old widescreen VHS of the movie, I had to buy a copy from the UK in order to find a DVD version that hadn't been hacked at. His horrible "director's cut" which is, last I heard, the only dvd version available in the U.S., is missing some of my favorite scenes, and is missing some of the music that was in the theatrical version. You just don't DO that to a film that had been in the public's consciousness for ten years prior to the DVD release. >.<)
And I hate the book. Actually, I just really dislike Cooper who invented the mythology of the "american hero" and yet wrote awful books that I just don't like, and often can't stand.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 03:43 am (UTC)I enjoyed the film though I don't think I would like that book. I've tried to read another one of his and never got more than a 100 pages in.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 04:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-23 06:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 09:30 pm (UTC)TG4 showed the silent 1920 Last of the Mohicans a few years ago. I recall a lot about the noble savage and a really tragic ending, though different to the 1994 version.
Two Irish presidents have been made chiefs of a native American people.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 09:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 06:53 am (UTC)Which two presidents?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 11:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-23 06:02 am (UTC)