Working Class Detectives
Aug. 13th, 2006 02:13 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
This came up after a conversation on a board about the Inspector Lynley books* and aristocratic detectives. So, there are obviously a ton of books which have the aristocratic detective and working class sidekick scenario (Lord Peter, Campion, the Lynley books, etc.). Are there any which reverse that that anyone can recommend? Mainly I think you are more likely to get it in American detective novels which, at least in classic hard-boiled form, tend to have more problems with wealth (as in the Philip Marlowe books) and the power it brings. But I'd be intrigued to read something English that does make the working class person the leader - and the smarter - in this partnership.
Sometimes I think that if you look at older detective fiction it tends to be more socially liberal than the books which appeared in the 1930s and 40s, and did not have such an obsession with the aristocratic detective. Maybe that's because the job itself is so much more socially ambiguous - I'm thinking of Holmes and the weird class stuff that goes on with the Duke of Holdernesse in The Priory School, where he is very emphatic about getting paid properly there. And that really early detective series (1827) - Richmond: Scenes in the Life of a Bow Street Runner has a really rather shady and lower class detective.
*Confession: I read part of one of this series and there are no words for how much I loathed it. Whoever the writer is she's not exactly a fan of the working class, is she?
ETA: So far I've got a couple of excellent suggestions: the Anne Perry novels with William Monk and others (I read some of these and really enjoyed them) and Foyle's War (I've also seen a few bits of these and thought they looked great). And I'd like to sing the praises of the Fforde book I am reading The Big Over Easy which has some fun with famous detectives and their sidekicks and nursery tale characters. I really recommend it.
Sometimes I think that if you look at older detective fiction it tends to be more socially liberal than the books which appeared in the 1930s and 40s, and did not have such an obsession with the aristocratic detective. Maybe that's because the job itself is so much more socially ambiguous - I'm thinking of Holmes and the weird class stuff that goes on with the Duke of Holdernesse in The Priory School, where he is very emphatic about getting paid properly there. And that really early detective series (1827) - Richmond: Scenes in the Life of a Bow Street Runner has a really rather shady and lower class detective.
*Confession: I read part of one of this series and there are no words for how much I loathed it. Whoever the writer is she's not exactly a fan of the working class, is she?
ETA: So far I've got a couple of excellent suggestions: the Anne Perry novels with William Monk and others (I read some of these and really enjoyed them) and Foyle's War (I've also seen a few bits of these and thought they looked great). And I'd like to sing the praises of the Fforde book I am reading The Big Over Easy which has some fun with famous detectives and their sidekicks and nursery tale characters. I really recommend it.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-13 10:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 02:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-13 10:45 pm (UTC)Really? I've read the whole series but you'll have to refresh me on book one. Elizabeth George is an American writer so...hmm.
I keep waiting for Sergeant Havers's own series because that working class character as written is far more compelling than Lynley has ever been.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 02:34 am (UTC)I think there's plenty of Americans who write in that tradition of the English polite detective, but hard boiled detective fiction is another beast entirely and has much more obvious (to my mind, at any rate) issues with corruption and wealth.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 06:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 01:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 01:06 am (UTC)Or above. And this concludes my spamming of your journal.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 03:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 12:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 02:30 am (UTC)But I'd still be interested to read if someone flipped the relationship so that the person with the most authority is actually the (so-called) social inferior, because I think it would be an interesting set up.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 09:58 pm (UTC)And yay, I love book talk!
no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 12:09 am (UTC)And I'm glad you told me who you were - I'd never have guessed it! (What prompted the movement from strawberries to pumpkins, she asks nosily?)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 12:16 am (UTC)Well, I've never really had one online ID like a lot of other people have--this LJ is relatively new and I was reminded of how much I adore the silly french yogurt name I saw years ago when I was setting it up. Plus, I love the colors.
There's even more gossamer. . .y. . . logic behind Pumpkin Cake. I had just tried a new recipe for pumpkin cake about five years ago when TWoP made the forums searchable only if you had a user name. I just wanted to search, Pumpkin Cake was the first thing that came to mind, and I picked it. So when I wanted to search the Fametracker boards, it seemed to only make sense to keep the same name and password. However, I posted there a grand total of 5 times, maybe. Maaaybe. But again, it just made sense to port this username over to SF--and if I'd known I was going to be an Oscar Winner, maybe I'd have gone with something else. Ah, well.
What about your username?
no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 12:33 am (UTC)