![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
And because I have no original thoughts of my own, I thought I'd
1. Marie Antoinette. I don't think I really need to expand on this one.
2. Mary Queen of Scots. For the Darnley episode alone followed closely by the insane stupidity of her marriage to Bothwell. I am always suprised that she did not come out with a plan to dance through her kingdom with a big sign saying 'I don't like Scotland! I have no idea what I am doing! Get rid of me please!'
3. Richard the Lionhearted. It's impressive isn't it - bleeding a country dry for pointless campaigns in the Holy Land and still coming across as the good guy? This is the magic of PR. I am actually not sure if he counts as absolutely stupid or as a complete wanker obsessed by waging war. But I still nominate him.
4. Scott of the Antartic. Leader of not just a doomed expedition but one doomed by planning that looks like it was done on copious amounts of crack. Also I am particularly fond of the fact that they used biscuit tins to keep the bit of their hut where the men lived from the bit where the officers lived in. Because you wouldn't want to die without maintaining proper protocol.
Suggestions for other candidates? They'd probably all kill each other or die of starvation in a week especially as they would have no servants, minions, court jesters, or courtiers.
ETA: some suggestions received: Nicholas II and Alexandria; Charles I & II and Warren G. Harding. And now Catherine Howard. Just think how good a reality show this would be! The frocks alone would be worth tuning in for. Plus the outbreaks of violence.
It's rather depressing how many of these people have romantic reputations and lots of glossy films about how tragic and noble they were.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 01:51 pm (UTC)Um, her Mum did a pretty good job of ruling the country when Mary got shipped of to France?
Personally charming but politically naive?
...um...
Yes.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 02:03 pm (UTC)I had a childish biography of her that painted her in glowing, tragic colours. And then I studied her in history and all my illusions were shattered.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 02:27 pm (UTC)Charles II. And I like the Cavaliers.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 02:29 pm (UTC)And Charles I was even more clueless than the second one, who at least knew how to have fun. And mistresses.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 02:32 pm (UTC)NicholasanAlexandra are excellent, excellent candidates. Folie a deux much?
no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 02:34 pm (UTC)I always suspected that they were the reincarnation of Marie Antoinette and Louis.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 03:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 03:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 02:30 pm (UTC)Warren G. Harding was amazingly stupid, although it didn't come out until he was dead.
Why *did* Richard get all the good P.R., anyway? I know not.
Let us not forget, in the list of Mary's stupidities, that she insisted on taking asylum in England instead of France, because she was confident that a cousin Queen wouldn't do anything to her. Yeah, right. It takes real effort to grow up at a Valois court and be that politically ignorant.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 02:36 pm (UTC)Let us not forget, in the list of Mary's stupidities, that she insisted on taking asylum in England instead of France, because she was confident that a cousin Queen wouldn't do anything to her.
Especially after she had laid claim to her throne and said she was illegitimate. That always makes queens love you.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 04:29 pm (UTC)Some of the pharaohs(names escape me) were not all that bright.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 05:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 07:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 07:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 07:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 07:37 pm (UTC)It makes sense that she didn't mention her premarital unchastity, but the adultery was so monumentally stupid that it seriously makes me wonder if she might have been mentally handicapped.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 11:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 09:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-27 07:46 am (UTC)Poor silly ill-advised (literally) bint.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 07:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 07:38 pm (UTC)Francois I of France - great patron of the arts; extremely bad soldier, who got a spanking at Pavia from Charles V and whose ransom cost France dearly.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 07:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 10:49 pm (UTC)Amenhotep IV aka Akhenaten, I think religous revolution without the priests is a good idea.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 10:51 pm (UTC)Good one. Also Akhenaten, because thinking you can totally get rid of a society's religious beliefs by one dictat shows some stupdity. Even if you are a god.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 11:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-27 07:48 am (UTC)The Hapsburg coverup attempt was also a marvel of cruelty and incompetence. They made the poor bereaved parents travel back to Vienna with the Baroness' corpse, propped up upright in their coach, so as to create the illusion that she hadn't died there.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-27 10:23 am (UTC)Oh. Just, oh. That's so appalling. And most of those 'romantic' suicide things turn out to be idiotic. Antony and Cleopatra being an exception because they had run out of options. And also because Cleopatra held off on it until she was sure what her fate was going to be.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 11:52 pm (UTC)"(2a) King Leopold II of Belgium is on my Top Five List of Historical Figures Whom I'd Like to Kick. Hard."
And then her brilliant:http://snowy-owlet.livejournal.com/424394.html
Love the tag "boneheads of history"
no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 07:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 07:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 11:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 11:34 pm (UTC)