Doctor Five Abuse
May. 30th, 2006 01:05 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Whenever I watch Peter Davison's Doctor it does seem as if he got the most physical abuse of any of the Doctors: they whack him good. And they whack him often. I assume this was a way to toughen up his mild image and general aura of niceness, but sometimes it just really freaks me out.
The most disturbing thing was watching The Caves of Androzani where Five is actually stumbling around the place bleeding. I can't tell you very terrifying that was as a child because I don't recall ever seeing blood on Who before - and certainly not on the Doctor, whom I think I probably thought of as pretty much made of wood and steel. Obviously given that this is Who, I'd seen people (plenty of them) hurt and dead, yes, but actual blood, no. I wonder how they got that past the censors? (I know that ITV used to have a rule for Robin of Sherwood where they could kill as many people as they liked but they couldn't show blood or wounds and I think that was a general rule for deaths on children's TV at the time).
no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 02:04 am (UTC)Five doesn't get a break in any of his episodes, though beyond Saward's splatterpunk sensiblities I suspect it might have had a cynical motivation, i.e. getting Mum and Sis (and the cousin who's not like the other boys) to fantasize about tenderly ministering to the noble good-looking young hero who suffers in silence.
Not that I'd know anything about that. I loved Six.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 02:13 am (UTC)Hee! I am sure the other reason was because nuns and poodles cost a lot of money (though they still had a budget in those days). Poor Five: I don't think Tegan went in for the mopping of the brow.
I loved Five and Six. I think I may have some sort of personality disorder.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 02:23 am (UTC)I'm gonna go look for some Five-Six fangroups now . .
no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 03:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 12:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 02:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 02:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 02:49 pm (UTC)Oh, right, that might have come out slightly wrong...
no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 02:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 11:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-01 02:53 am (UTC)(Again this is only personal experience, but I've not been in Who fandom for very long) Six seems to get a lot of flack for helping kill off the series and mad overacting - something which Seven oddly seems to escape. But Five and Six were my doctors so I have a deep fondness (nay, love) for them. Though I will admit Six wasn't above scenery chewing from time to time.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-01 10:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-01 03:37 pm (UTC)How much of this was Saward's tastes and how much of it was driven by a desire to have Five's era be very different from Four's I don't know.