...and probably don't want to know. But I will tell you anyway, because that's the sort of person I am. I think that makes me very Roman, because the Romans weren't the sort of people to consult your opinion on anything. Of course, I don't actually have an empire, but maybe someone will leave one lying around so I can pick it up.
1. For a long, long time, the Spartans were the only people who could advance in step. Everyone else in ancient Greece usually only turned up a few days before the battle, but the Spartans could spend all their time training. Mind you, the Spartans also could only do this because they'd enslaved and routinely terroized their neighbours, the Messenians
2. The Spartans were also the only people with matching equipment; everyone else just turned up in what they bought privately or could borrow off friends with more money.
3. It was a long time before people worked out how to use cavalry against foot soldiers because there were no stirrups and saddles and so if you hit into a heavily armoured group of men in formation you'd probably fall off your horse and not do any damage before they killed you. Philip of Macedon was the guy who worked out that you could give them a long javelin to poke at people and solve that problem.
4. Pyrrhus (he of the Pyrrhic victory) was killed when an old woman threw a tile at his head from a roof, stunning him enough so someone could finish him off.
5. Elephants were great in war until they freaked out and trampled their own side. This happened a lot. They are also only effective against tightly packed infantry; they just sort of slide through infantry in loose formation
6. Both cities that suffered the most and offered up the biggest percentages of their manpower in the Persian Wars - Thespis and Plataea - get pretty much wiped out in the Peloponnesian War.
7. Livy once spent several very funny pages explaining why the Romans would have defeated Alexander had he attacked them. This is the earliest known example of what would later morph into the 'Superman vs. Spiderman' debate.
1. For a long, long time, the Spartans were the only people who could advance in step. Everyone else in ancient Greece usually only turned up a few days before the battle, but the Spartans could spend all their time training. Mind you, the Spartans also could only do this because they'd enslaved and routinely terroized their neighbours, the Messenians
2. The Spartans were also the only people with matching equipment; everyone else just turned up in what they bought privately or could borrow off friends with more money.
3. It was a long time before people worked out how to use cavalry against foot soldiers because there were no stirrups and saddles and so if you hit into a heavily armoured group of men in formation you'd probably fall off your horse and not do any damage before they killed you. Philip of Macedon was the guy who worked out that you could give them a long javelin to poke at people and solve that problem.
4. Pyrrhus (he of the Pyrrhic victory) was killed when an old woman threw a tile at his head from a roof, stunning him enough so someone could finish him off.
5. Elephants were great in war until they freaked out and trampled their own side. This happened a lot. They are also only effective against tightly packed infantry; they just sort of slide through infantry in loose formation
6. Both cities that suffered the most and offered up the biggest percentages of their manpower in the Persian Wars - Thespis and Plataea - get pretty much wiped out in the Peloponnesian War.
7. Livy once spent several very funny pages explaining why the Romans would have defeated Alexander had he attacked them. This is the earliest known example of what would later morph into the 'Superman vs. Spiderman' debate.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 05:08 am (UTC)For the first time in my life I want to
no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 05:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 05:13 am (UTC)ELEPHANTS. SLIDING THROUGH.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 05:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 11:53 am (UTC)Heeeee! True stuff is always funny. Gotta love those Roman ancestors of mine.
And don't worry, I find stuff like this fascinating, but then again I am a history geek. Actually, I've been meaning to read a buit more about ancient Greek and ROman history. Got any good book recommendations?
no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 05:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 12:32 pm (UTC)Also, this is such an exciting post for me because I'm actually reading about the Spartan Hoplites RIGHT NOW. I feel they were much like the tanks of the ancient world (only, people.) Also, I like the 'pelters' - clearly this wasn't such a novel concept for the Greeks as it was for David, eh?
no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 05:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 04:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-07 07:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-07 12:40 pm (UTC)I found out about E's revolutionary tactics, though, although they seem so simple in hindsight :P
no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 01:48 pm (UTC)I'm rereading the Prince for class next week and your ancient warfare bits are *much* funnier than Machiavelli's.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 05:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 01:52 pm (UTC)Livy once spent several very funny pages explaining why the Romans would have defeated Alexander had he attacked them. This is the earliest known example of what would later morph into the 'Superman vs. Spiderman' debate.
I may borrow this -- I tend to use "Enterprise vs. Death Star" but I think that marks me out as a little too geeky.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 05:56 am (UTC)I seem to remember this also. But I recently read about a battle where actually having more elephants was an advantage which upset all my preconceived notions.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 12:25 am (UTC)...Sorry I just remember it and had to share this important bit of information.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 04:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 06:02 am (UTC)